EdTech: Choosing the best resources

Average rating is 3.9 out of 5    
Module description.

This module looks at how to deliver the best outcomes from systematic and professional searches for suitable resources.

This will include balancing the challenges of credibility, reliability, usability and suitability when assessing the worth of found resources and taking into account what learners find and bring with them.

This is an Leading Module

You may also be interested in

Feedback about this module

Average feedback ratings

Taking note of your feedback

We greatly appreciate the time taken to provide us with feedback on each module. We regularly review all the feedback provided and use it to inform the development of new modules. Subject to funds being available and other constraints, we will amend existing modules where feedback shows this is required.

Feedback from other members about this module

7th July 2020
Paulina Lipiec
The rating is 4 out of 5
Our Response: Great thanks!
6th July 2020
Kate Stallard
The rating is 4 out of 5
Our Response: Adding a comment to your rating makes a real difference! Thanks.
6th July 2020
Abigail Baker
The rating is 3 out of 5
Our Response: Thanks for taking the time to review your experience, this will inform your peers and help us understand how to improve!
6th July 2020
Eleanor Bakhshandeiar
The rating is 2 out of 5
Our Response: Thank you. We appreciate your feedback. It is important for us to understand how to improve our training modules and, subject to you having given consent, we will be in touch to discuss it further with you. Alternatively, please do not hesitate to contact our Helpdesk on 0330 22 333 63. Understanding your views is important to us.
3rd July 2020
Barbara Driscoll
The rating is 4 out of 5
Our Response: Thank you for the encouraging feedback!
1st July 2020
Antony Mellor
The rating is 4 out of 5
Our Response: Thank you for your helpful comments which will inform our ongoing development.
23rd June 2020 (edited on 23rd June 2020)
Allan Barnes
The rating is 4 out of 5
Our Response: Cool!
4th June 2020
Tanya Franklin
The rating is 4 out of 5
Our Response: Thank you for your helpful comments which will inform our ongoing development.
4th June 2020 (edited on 4th June 2020)
Jane Roche
The rating is 4 out of 5
Our Response: Cool!
1st June 2020
Firoza Pathan
The rating is 5 out of 5
Our Response: Thank you for the positive feedback!
29th May 2020
Catherine Pitkin
The rating is 3 out of 5
Our Response: Looks like we did not quite meet your expectations. Thanks for your feedback.
28th May 2020
PAUL JAKUBOWSKI
The rating is 4 out of 5
Our Response: Cool!
18th May 2020
Steven Webb
The rating is 4 out of 5
Our Response: Thank you.
17th May 2020 (edited on 17th May 2020)
Edward Chambers
The rating is 4 out of 5
Our Response: Appreciated!
16th May 2020
Helen Aymes
The rating is 3 out of 5
Our Response: Thank you. We have noted your feedback.
15th May 2020
Anjka Rodgers-Jones
The rating is 4 out of 5
Our Response: A comment is always helpful, thanks.
15th May 2020
Dawn Bours
The rating is 4 out of 5
Our Response: Adding a comment to your rating makes a real difference! Thanks.
29th April 2020
Denise Wood
The rating is 3 out of 5
Our Response: Looks like we did not quite meet your expectations. Thanks for your feedback.
28th April 2020
Tony Jenks
The rating is 4 out of 5
Our Response: Appreciated!
26th April 2020
Andy Wooldridge
The rating is 5 out of 5
Our Response: Glad this module met your expectations!
22nd April 2020
Mark Kneill-Boxley
The rating is 5 out of 5
Our Response: Great thanks!
20th April 2020
Heather Avis Brumby
The rating is 5 out of 5
Our Response: Appreciated!
15th April 2020
Barry Taberner
The rating is 4 out of 5
Our Response: Great thanks!
14th April 2020
Dr Emily Stammitti-Campbell
The rating is 3 out of 5
Our Response: Looks like we did not quite meet your expectations. Thanks for your feedback.
5th April 2020
Liliya Balanyuk
The rating is 5 out of 5
Our Response: Glad this module met your expectations!
3rd April 2020
Richard Clarke
The rating is 4 out of 5
Our Response: Appreciated!
3rd April 2020
steve jackson
The rating is 3 out of 5
Our Response: Looks like we did not quite meet your expectations. Thanks for your feedback.
31st March 2020
dawn goodman
The rating is 3 out of 5
Our Response: Looks like we did not quite meet your expectations. Thanks for your feedback.
2nd March 2020
Peter KIlcoyne
The rating is 5 out of 5
Our Response: Great thanks!
16th February 2020
Matthew Gordon
The rating is 3 out of 5
Our Response: Thank you. We have noted your feedback.